Overview

Why is the importance of giving and receiving feedback across cultures a big topic in today’s workplace? In this article, you will be provided with insights and resources that can help you and your team members to manage a more peaceful across cultures coexistence in a workplace.

Also, you will learn about the psychological background of feedback, the benefits of effective cross-cultural feedback, alternatives to traditional feedback methods, and the potential consequences of improperly handled feedback.

In this article, we will also look at how you can use this idea in your professional context to improve the performance and dynamics of your team as well as the overall efficacy of the organization you work for.

Why is The Importance of Giving and Receiving Feedback in Multicultural Corporate Settings a Must?

In a globalized marketplace, the workforce comprises individuals from varied cultural backgrounds. This diversity brings diverse perspectives, unique skill sets, and experiences, making effective feedback unavoidable. Managing across cultures requires an awareness of different cultural norms and a keen ability to navigate and leverage these differences productively.

By understanding the importance of giving and receiving feedback across cultures, an organization can create an environment that fosters personal and professional growth, is more inclusive, promotes team cohesion, and leads teams with trust also values its employees.

As a result, this will increase team loyalty and overall organizational performance. However, feedback management across cultures can vary significantly, making its effectiveness questionable if not implemented effectively across cultures.

If on the other hand, you would like to know more in-depth about ”The Art of 6 Steps of Effective Feedback” and how to implement the steps correctly, click here.

The Psychological Principles

A strong foundation of psychological principles underlies feedback. The fact that various cultures view feedback differently is another aspect that affects it, i.e. how they view and react to constructive criticism and what purpose this kind of criticism originally serves in their organization.

In addition, an individual’s motivation and performance can be greatly impacted by how feedback is provided and used. Now, let’s explore some of these psychological principles.

1. Reinforcement Theory

The ‘Reinforcement Theory‘ developed by B.F. Skinner states that behavior is dependent on a learner’s cognitive capacity and is shaped by the outcomes of that behavior. Positive reinforcement increases the likelihood that a behavior will stay. Needless to say, that positive reinforcement must be repeated a couple of times so that desired behavior becomes a habit.

On the other side, it is more probable that a behavior won’t be repeated if undesirable outcomes support it.

In other words, positive feedback reinforces desired behavior and guides individuals toward improvement. For example, some cultures might cherish direct feedback without encouraging a more indirect and nuanced approach.

2. Social Learning Theory

However, Canadian-American psychologist Albert Bandura created the ”Social Learning Theory”, which suggests that people pick up behavioral skills through observation. Thus, modeling followed by the adoption of an observed behavior emphasizes how crucial feedback is.

Employees in a multicultural workplace will be more accepting of feedback when it is given. Additionally, if it is applied in a particular manner and not in another, staff members will use this strategy without hesitation or doubt. Because the strategy is widely recognized in the organization, even if an employee doesn’t agree with it, he or she will nevertheless embrace and model it.

3. Cultural Dimensions Theory

One more theory that feedback is based upon is Geert Hofstede’s ”Cultural Dimensions Theory”. This theory offers a framework for comprehending how variations in cultural values affect workplace actions and, consequently, feedback dynamics. International management and cross-cultural psychology both make use of this great theory. We shall just address its most important dimensions:

This theory emphasizes six dimensions that shape how feedback is given and received in different corporate cultures. Recognizing and taking into consideration these dimensions is key to ensuring feedback is constructive and well-received.

Advantages: Importance of Giving and Receiving Feedback Across Cultures

Feedback managing across cultures is essential and has several advantages that help with both individual and group performance. But what are they?

1. Enhance Communication

Feedback that is founded on productive, transparent, and courteous communication helps to close cultural divides and leads teams with more trust. You can learn more about this by reading our article: ”How to Build Trust in a Team Through Transparent Leadership and Effective Communication.”

This culture of open communication will always foster a sense of inclusivity in the workplace, even though miscommunications may still happen, as long as everyone works toward the same objectives, team members will always come to a common word afterward.

The coworkers will experience a sense of value from their superiors and appreciation for their individuality.

2. Feedback Intervention Theory

Kluger and DeNisi (1996) define feedback intervention as: “…actions taken by (an) external agent (s) to provide information regarding some aspect(s) of one’s task performance.”

This theory suggests that when constructive feedback is properly exercised, it can significantly enhance the learning and task performance of team member when there is a discrepancy between their current level of performance and organizational goals.

Having said that, it is evident that receiving feedback helps an individual’s personal and professional growth. By offering direction and assistance, a team member gains an understanding of the caliber of their work. Encouraging them to become more conscious of and observant of their areas of growth potential. This encourages lifelong learning and development.

3. Better Decision-Making and Problem-Solving

It is more likely that managers and employees who hold managerial positions will more likely make well-informed and unbiased-balanced decisions when they are transparent with their teams and are open to diverse viewpoints.

Although working in a team is not always simple, it can be made easier if managers and their teams take into account a psychological model called ‘The Johari Window‘, which helps them recognize the conscious and unconscious biases they may be harboring toward both themselves and other people.

4. Trust Build and Increase in Performance

Human nature dictates that trust builds when someone is understood and feels heard. The same thing takes place when the company advocates for this policy and ensures that its workers feel heard and understood. This immediately boosts staff trust in the company, which in turn improves team chemistry and fosters high performance as well as a more harmonious and effective work environment.

Additionally to this, regular feedback fosters an environment of mutual support. Open communication creates a supportive environment for one another. People start to recognize and take up contentious problems that they otherwise would not have ventured to, and they become more open to working together.

Downside and Challenges

Like 360-degree method of providing feedback, also the regular feedback across cultures comes with some disadvantages. It is already clear how important it is to provide and receive feedback across cultures, and when done thoughtfully, the negative aspects may be mostly avoided. But what is the downside?

1. Misunderstandings & Misinterpretations

It is impossible to provide constructive criticism flawlessly every time. It is challenging to take into account a recipient’s diverse cultural upbringing, mental capacity, priorities, and cognitive condition. Misunderstandings will inevitably occur. Even after accounting for all of these variables—such as communication style, social norms, and hierarchical structures—it’s possible that your method of doing it impaired the transmission and caused misunderstandings.

One more thing is that there are also preferences in what feedback style is accepted in the organization. For instance, direct feedback may be accepted whereas continuous check-ins might be perceived as rude or confrontational.

2. The Power of Distance

According to Geert Hofstede and his ”Cultural Dimension Theory” the concept of power distance, can further complicate the effectivity of feedback. In high-context cultures, subordinates are more likely to be hesitant to provide honest and open feedback to their superiors due to respect for hierarchy and fear of repercussions.

The same happens the other way around. In low-context distance cultures, open and blunt communication is encouraged, but this can sometimes be perceived as disrespectful which can damage the relationship and create tension among team members.

3. Communication Style

There are so many different communication styles that are constantly changing. Some cultures prefer one over the other and finding the appropriate balance is not an easy thing. For instance in high-context cultures rely very much on implicit communication and non-verbal cues. Whereas on the other hand, low-context cultures depend on explicit verbal information. If we try and mix them, feedback information will be lost, leading to misinterpretation and ineffective communication.

Download my Guide

Loading…

Great!

Your free Guide is on its way to you. 

It will be waiting for you in your inbox in just a few minutes!

4. One-Size-Fits-All Feedback

Many organizations are guilty of this feedback process. They often neglect to consider the multicultural background of their team members, falling into pitfalls they themselves created. There is not one way of practicing feedback due to the many cultural nuances every coworker brings with them.

5. Inconsistent Feedback

It might seem meanness, but is actually not. When trying to implement new behavior or change the course of things happening consistency and repetition of a new behavior is the key factor. The reason why inconsistent feedback practices arise is due to differing cultural norms organizations are faced with.

When giving feedback, it’s critical to convey the point clearly, precisely, and consistently—without leaving room for ambiguity. Until the new desired behavior is ingrained in the routine, feedback must be given consistently and in the same style every time.

How The Managing Across Cultures Feedback is Done?

In culturally diverse organizations, integrating feedback effectively requires a sensitive strategy that takes into account the varying cultural backgrounds of employees. In this process, elegance and cultural understanding are crucial. Here are some actionable strategies.

1. Active Listening

Speaking your mind and not worrying about the repercussions of your feedback is not the only aspect of open communication. It also implies that you pay close attention to anything your teammates have to say and actively listen to them. All of the communication’s spoken and unspoken gestures. And this also includes that your response is thoughtful, meeting your recipient’s expectations. Active listening fosters a sense of respect and understanding, which further cultivates an environment for acceptance and mutual respect.

2. Empathy

It is also an essential component of open communication. You may make your comments more palatable to your recipient by putting yourself in their shoes and seeing the world from their perspective. Additionally, empathy allows for the bridging of unintentional cultural divides and shifts the perception of criticism from critical to supportive and constructive.

3. Framing Feedback Style

This means that one who delivers constructive feedback understands how the recipient’s cultural norms and values influence how they will perceive the feedback.

Yet, feedback style also plays a part. For instance, a person from Western culture responds better to direct feedback than one from an Asian one. Another possibility is that an Asian employee would respond better to indirect feedback. Having input that is in line with one’s cultural background increases its efficacy.

4. Training and Development Programs

It is not simple to navigate cultural differences in a multi-cultural organization. Here come to provide help supportive developmental programs. The abilities required to traverse these multitasking contexts can be imparted to managers and employees in leadership roles through training programs and workshops on communication competence, cultural differences, and their personal and organizational uniqueness.

Additionally, it can only be advantageous to plan workshops where team members and staff learn everything there is to know about cultural dimensions and successful cross-cultural communication. Multinational corporations in particular ought to be highly interested in these trainings.

In these cross-cultural training sessions, members can be encouraged to share their cultural backgrounds and preferences regarding feedback. This method will create an inclusive environment with mutual respect, acceptance, and openness.

Managing Across Cultures: Feedback Examples

In culturally heterogeneous settings, giving and receiving feedback is fraught with difficulties and disadvantages. Here are several instances where, assuming a different cultural background, one feedback style performs better than another.

1. Direct vs. Indirect Feedback

For example, direct and honest feedback is more positively seen and regarded as productive in many English-speaking Western countries. This indicates that direct input is frequently preferred and highly regarded in low-context countries like Germany and the United States. In organizations with this kind of background, attempting to apply indirect feedback will result in the feedback being viewed as inadequate, ambiguous, and contradictory.

One example: “Please next time consider the time frame when giving your speech. Thanks!”

Conversely, in high-context societies like those of Asia, giving input in this manner is generally frowned upon. Eastern-bred employees place a higher value on upholding peace and avoiding conflict. Thus, there is a greater need for feedback to be given in a more sophisticated and nuanced way. If not, it would be viewed as evasive and offensive.

One example: “I noticed that your speech took more time than it was planned. Perhaps we could explore ways to lessen the duration of it by stating more concisely the main points. What do you think?”

2. Group vs. Individual Feedback

In multinational corporations, group feedback is a common practice. Not only due to the company’s size but also because teamwork is key to success and many projects are completed in groups.

One example: “The collaboration you all provided to one another on the project wasn’t at its best. I expect a follow-up meeting to address the causes of it.”

In individualist cultures and in organizations of a rather smaller size, feedback is typically directed at the individual’s performance.

One example: “Sara, the way you handled customer’s concerns wasn’t outstanding. I recommend we work on this set of skills, so in future, you handle it with ease.”

Criticism on the Importance of Giving and Receiving Feedback Across Cultures

However, feedback isn’t always able to take into account all the variables involved, including cultural origins. Let’s examine where these critics are directed to.

1. Generalisation

One criticism is directed toward the tendency of overgeneralizing cultural norms and values, taking for granted that all team members or employees who share the same background will also respond similarly to the same feedback.

Download my Guide

Loading…

Great!

Your free Guide is on its way to you. 

It will be waiting for you in your inbox in just a few minutes!

This is, of course, a stereotypical way of thinking and cannot deliver constructive feedback. Individual characteristics always need to be considered when giving feedback, not just the social background of the recipient.

2. No Space for Individual Preferences

Putting cultural norms on a pedestal and leaving out individual preferences and experiences is not the correct thing to do either. There must be an appropriate balance between these two parameters so they suit each employee’s unique style and needs.

3. Resistance to Change

Humans are naturally resistant to change, even when it is for their own good. The same guidelines hold true for feedback. The introduction of novel feedback-giving techniques may encounter fierce opposition from subordinates as well as from managers and other key individuals.

Change management strategies are essential to facilitate the adoption of new feedback methods.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective leadership requires leveraging the advantages of constructive feedback when managing large groups of people or organizations. Understanding the significant roles that cultural differences play in a multi-cultural organization can put you in a better position to develop your communication skills, create a growth-oriented atmosphere for yourself and your team, establish trust, and enhance performance.

I cannot stress enough the importance of giving and receiving feedback across cultures. Organizations can successfully traverse the difficulties of a diverse workforce by utilizing the benefits of feedback that best works for them, which improves decision-making and yields good results. Hence a nuanced approach to feedback is a necessity.

By understanding psychological principles, and integrating cultural backgrounds, everyone who is in leading positions can navigate this complex world of multi-cultural organizations with greater ease.

Your Takeaway

The importance of giving and receiving feedback across cultures lies in its ability to bridge communication and perceptual gaps, enhance personal and professional growth, and build a cohesive and productive work environment. This includes implementing strategies like active listening and empathy, framing feedback style, and training programs.

By understanding cultural differences and implementing tailored constructive feedback, organizations can effectively manage across cultures differences and create a more inclusive, productive work environment for everyone.